two-qubits
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| two-qubits [June 13, 2026 at 02:54] – Ivan Janevski | two-qubits [June 13, 2026 at 03:23] (current) – Ivan Janevski | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| A general two-qubit state is a superposition over the four computational basis states, with the normalization condition saying the total probability must be 1: | A general two-qubit state is a superposition over the four computational basis states, with the normalization condition saying the total probability must be 1: | ||
| - | $$\lvert\psi\rangle = c_{00}\lvert 00\rangle + c_{01}\lvert 01\rangle + c_{10}\lvert 10\rangle + c_{11}\lvert 11\rangle, \qquad |c_{00}|^2 + |c_{01}|^2 + |c_{10}|^2 + |c_{11}|^2 = 1$$ | + | $$\lvert\psi\rangle = \begin{pmatrix}c_{00}\\c_{01}\\c_{10}\\c_{11}\end{pmatrix}, |
| ## Product states | ## Product states | ||
| - | The simplest two-qubit states are **product states**: states where the two qubits are independent of each other. If qubit 0 is in $a\lvert 0\rangle + b\lvert 1\rangle$ and qubit 1 is in $c\lvert 0\rangle + d\lvert 1\rangle$, the combined state is just their tensor product: | + | The simplest two-qubit states are **product states**: states where the two qubits are independent of each other. If qubit 1 is in $a\lvert 0\rangle + b\lvert 1\rangle$ and qubit 0 is in $c\lvert 0\rangle + d\lvert 1\rangle$, the combined state is just their tensor product: |
| - | $$\lvert\psi_0\rangle\otimes\lvert\psi_1\rangle = ac\lvert 00\rangle + ad\lvert 01\rangle + bc\lvert 10\rangle + bd\lvert 11\rangle$$ | + | $$\lvert\psi_1\rangle\otimes\lvert\psi_0\rangle = ac\lvert 00\rangle + ad\lvert 01\rangle + bc\lvert 10\rangle + bd\lvert 11\rangle$$ |
| - | The shorthand $\lvert\psi_0\psi_1\rangle$ means $\lvert\psi_0\rangle\otimes\lvert\psi_1\rangle$. There are infinitely many product states. Any pair of single-qubit states gives you one. The ones worth naming come from picking a standard single-qubit basis and using it for both qubits. | + | The shorthand $\lvert\psi_1\psi_0\rangle$ means $\lvert\psi_1\rangle\otimes\lvert\psi_0\rangle$. There are infinitely many product states. Any pair of single-qubit states gives you one. The ones worth naming come from picking a standard single-qubit basis and using it for both qubits. |
| ### Z-basis (Computational basis) | ### Z-basis (Computational basis) | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| | [[ket-11|$\lvert 11\rangle$]] | Both qubits are $\lvert 1\rangle$. | | | [[ket-11|$\lvert 11\rangle$]] | Both qubits are $\lvert 1\rangle$. | | ||
| - | ### X-basis | + | ### X-basis |
| Pick [[ket-plus|$\lvert +\rangle$]] and [[ket-minus|$\lvert -\rangle$]] for each qubit instead. These states look " | Pick [[ket-plus|$\lvert +\rangle$]] and [[ket-minus|$\lvert -\rangle$]] for each qubit instead. These states look " | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| ^ State ^ Expansion in computational basis ^ Description ^ | ^ State ^ Expansion in computational basis ^ Description ^ | ||
| | $\lvert ++\rangle$ | $\tfrac{1}{2}(\lvert 00\rangle + \lvert 01\rangle + \lvert 10\rangle + \lvert 11\rangle)$ | Both qubits in [[ket-plus|$\lvert +\rangle$]]. Uniform superposition over all four computational basis states; $H\otimes H\lvert 00\rangle = \lvert ++\rangle$. | | | $\lvert ++\rangle$ | $\tfrac{1}{2}(\lvert 00\rangle + \lvert 01\rangle + \lvert 10\rangle + \lvert 11\rangle)$ | Both qubits in [[ket-plus|$\lvert +\rangle$]]. Uniform superposition over all four computational basis states; $H\otimes H\lvert 00\rangle = \lvert ++\rangle$. | | ||
| - | | $\lvert +-\rangle$ | $\tfrac{1}{2}(\lvert 00\rangle - \lvert 01\rangle + \lvert 10\rangle - \lvert 11\rangle)$ | Qubit 0 in [[ket-plus|$\lvert +\rangle$]], | + | | $\lvert +-\rangle$ | $\tfrac{1}{2}(\lvert 00\rangle - \lvert 01\rangle + \lvert 10\rangle - \lvert 11\rangle)$ | Qubit 1 in [[ket-plus|$\lvert +\rangle$]], |
| - | | $\lvert -+\rangle$ | $\tfrac{1}{2}(\lvert 00\rangle + \lvert 01\rangle - \lvert 10\rangle - \lvert 11\rangle)$ | Qubit 0 in [[ket-minus|$\lvert -\rangle$]], | + | | $\lvert -+\rangle$ | $\tfrac{1}{2}(\lvert 00\rangle + \lvert 01\rangle - \lvert 10\rangle - \lvert 11\rangle)$ | Qubit 1 in [[ket-minus|$\lvert -\rangle$]], |
| | $\lvert --\rangle$ | $\tfrac{1}{2}(\lvert 00\rangle - \lvert 01\rangle - \lvert 10\rangle + \lvert 11\rangle)$ | Both qubits in [[ket-minus|$\lvert -\rangle$]]. | | | $\lvert --\rangle$ | $\tfrac{1}{2}(\lvert 00\rangle - \lvert 01\rangle - \lvert 10\rangle + \lvert 11\rangle)$ | Both qubits in [[ket-minus|$\lvert -\rangle$]]. | | ||
| - | ### Y-basis | + | ### Y-basis |
| Pick [[ket-plus-i|$\lvert +i\rangle$]] and [[ket-minus-i|$\lvert -i\rangle$]] for each qubit. These are the eigenstates of the Y gate. The coefficients are complex, so the Y-basis states are the first ones on this page with imaginary entries. You get from the computational basis to the Y basis by applying $SH$ to every qubit ($H$ first, then $S$). | Pick [[ket-plus-i|$\lvert +i\rangle$]] and [[ket-minus-i|$\lvert -i\rangle$]] for each qubit. These are the eigenstates of the Y gate. The coefficients are complex, so the Y-basis states are the first ones on this page with imaginary entries. You get from the computational basis to the Y basis by applying $SH$ to every qubit ($H$ first, then $S$). | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| ^ State ^ Expansion in computational basis ^ Description ^ | ^ State ^ Expansion in computational basis ^ Description ^ | ||
| | $\lvert +i, | | $\lvert +i, | ||
| - | | $\lvert +i, | + | | $\lvert +i, |
| - | | $\lvert -i, | + | | $\lvert -i, |
| | $\lvert -i, | | $\lvert -i, | ||
| ## Entangled states | ## Entangled states | ||
| - | Some two-qubit states cannot be written as $\lvert\psi_0\rangle\otimes\lvert\psi_1\rangle$ for any choice of single-qubit states. These are **entangled states**. The give-away is that the four amplitudes $c_{00}, c_{01}, c_{10}, c_{11}$ cannot be factored into two pairs: entanglement means $c_{00}c_{11} \neq c_{01}c_{10}$. | + | Some two-qubit states cannot be written as $\lvert\psi_1\rangle\otimes\lvert\psi_0\rangle$ for any choice of single-qubit states. These are **entangled states**. The give-away is that the four amplitudes $c_{00}, c_{01}, c_{10}, c_{11}$ cannot be factored into two pairs: entanglement means $c_{00}c_{11} \neq c_{01}c_{10}$. |
| What does that mean physically? Measuring one qubit of an entangled state instantly determines the outcome of measuring the other, even though neither qubit has a definite value before measurement. The correlations are stronger than anything a classical system can produce. | What does that mean physically? Measuring one qubit of an entangled state instantly determines the outcome of measuring the other, even though neither qubit has a definite value before measurement. The correlations are stronger than anything a classical system can produce. | ||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
| ^ State ^ Definition ^ Correlations ^ | ^ State ^ Definition ^ Correlations ^ | ||
| - | | [[ket-phi-plus|$\lvert\Phi^+\rangle$]] | $\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\lvert 00\rangle + \lvert 11\rangle)$ | Same-value in Z and X; anti-correlated in Y. Prepared from $\lvert 00\rangle$ by $H\otimes I$ then CNOT. | | + | | [[ket-phi-plus|$\lvert\Phi^+\rangle$]] | $\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\lvert 00\rangle + \lvert 11\rangle)$ | Same-value in Z and X; anti-correlated in Y. Prepared from $\lvert 00\rangle$ by $H\otimes I$ then CX. | |
| | [[ket-phi-minus|$\lvert\Phi^-\rangle$]] | $\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\lvert 00\rangle - \lvert 11\rangle)$ | Same-value in Z; anti-correlated in X. The minus sign is invisible in Z-basis measurements. | | | [[ket-phi-minus|$\lvert\Phi^-\rangle$]] | $\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\lvert 00\rangle - \lvert 11\rangle)$ | Same-value in Z; anti-correlated in X. The minus sign is invisible in Z-basis measurements. | | ||
| - | | [[ket-psi-plus|$\lvert\Psi^+\rangle$]] | $\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\lvert 01\rangle + \lvert 10\rangle)$ | Anti-correlated in Z; same-value in X. Prepared from $\lvert 01\rangle$ by $H\otimes I$ then CNOT. | | + | | [[ket-psi-plus|$\lvert\Psi^+\rangle$]] | $\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\lvert 01\rangle + \lvert 10\rangle)$ | Anti-correlated in Z; same-value in X. Prepared from $\lvert 01\rangle$ by $H\otimes I$ then CX. | |
| | [[ket-psi-minus|$\lvert\Psi^-\rangle$]] | $\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\lvert 01\rangle - \lvert 10\rangle)$ | Anti-correlated in every basis. The only antisymmetric Bell state; also called the singlet. | | | [[ket-psi-minus|$\lvert\Psi^-\rangle$]] | $\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\lvert 01\rangle - \lvert 10\rangle)$ | Anti-correlated in every basis. The only antisymmetric Bell state; also called the singlet. | | ||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
| ## Gates | ## Gates | ||
| - | Two-qubit gates are $4\times 4$ unitary matrices acting on $\mathbb{C}^4$. The three most common ones are CX (CNOT), CZ, and SWAP. Row and column ordering follows the computational basis: $\lvert 00\rangle, \lvert 01\rangle, \lvert 10\rangle, \lvert 11\rangle$. | + | Two-qubit gates are $4\times 4$ unitary matrices acting on $\mathbb{C}^4$. The three most common ones are CX (CX), CZ, and SWAP. Row and column ordering follows the computational basis: $\lvert 00\rangle, \lvert 01\rangle, \lvert 10\rangle, \lvert 11\rangle$. |
| $$CX = \begin{pmatrix}1& | $$CX = \begin{pmatrix}1& | ||
| Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
| qc = QuantumCircuit(2, | qc = QuantumCircuit(2, | ||
| qc.h(0) | qc.h(0) | ||
| - | qc.cx(0, 1) # | + | qc.cx(0, 1) # |
| qc.measure([0, | qc.measure([0, | ||
two-qubits.1781319293.txt.gz · Last modified: by Ivan Janevski
